Breaking News

10 Differences Between Commercial And Open Source GIS Software

10 Differences Between Commercial And Open Source GIS Software
2.07 ( 43 votes )

2. PRICING
PRICING

Many commercial GIS software are quite expensive.  It costs thousands of dollars on initial purchase. This does not include the yearly maintenance fee.  While for open source software, it is the completely opposite.  Open source software is completely free on the initial download and no licensing fee or maintenance fee. The no cost tag of open source GIS software gives it an edge over commercial GIS software in the market.

2 of 10

Check Also

Vector and Raster Data || Difference Between Raster and Vector Data

Difference Between Raster and Vector Data

Rate this post Vector and Raster Data || Difference Between Raster and Vector Data This ...

4 comments

  1. There is capitalism and there is turbo-capitalism.

    I like to introduce the differentiation between commercial software and turbo-commercial software.

    Many users don’t mind to pay some fee to buy software, which has advantages, also disadvantages, as we know.

    But to be dependent by a software company and to pay for any other extra service, and to be enforced in work only in this ‘family’ is counter-productive. Guess, who is working as turbo-commercial software vendure in the world of GIS?

  2. I think that this constant need to compare and contrast ‘open source’ with ‘closed source’ (COTS, Proprietary, Bespoke, whatever term takes your fancy) is simply a fanciful endeavour to confuse and deflect against what is really happening in the world of geospatial today. I made an attempt in this post https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/opening-up-paul-synnott to put this into some context. Yes, its written from an Esri perspective (for obvious reasons) but I would hope that others (COTS and Open Source) would have a similar perspective to how users are now engaging with geospatial technologies, irrespective as to the nature of the software being ‘open’ or ‘closed’ source; because guess what, it no longer matters to those who really count i.e. our respective customers.

  3. Well said Ted Stephenson,
    this article is really, how should I put it, junk. I have worked in GIS for over 20 year using both commercial and open source software. The gains the open source GIS software has made over the commercial stuff is phenomenal. A key difference between commercial and open source, is commercial is made purely to make profit for the company where as opensource is created and maintained by intelligent passionate people who what to make the best software in their own time. EG. MapInfo was the premiere windows GIS software in the 90s. Pitynes Bowes bought it and let it go to crap by no advancing it with new technology. QGIS on the other hand just gets better and better. My current job has access to commercial GIS desktop, but I keep using QGIS cause its fast and better.

    Support, what a load of garbage. OpenSource support smashes commercial support. That’s cause open source is supported by the people who create it, so they know what they are talking about, and WANT to fix the issue. Commercial usually just some dude who has that job to do. EG. I had an issue with ArcGIS Desktop, they said it would be fixed some time in the next 6 months. QGIS my issue was fixed in 2 weeks and they replied immediately so I know that status of problem. When it was fixed I could down load the nightly build and be in my way. ESRI had to wait for a patch which was months away.

    Oh yeah don’t forget the commercial software also uses open source libraries like GDAL, and because GDAL is MIT then they can sell it with their closed software. This means open source improves their functionality. But do you think the commercial company gives donations or contributes to the open source project? Some do but my guess most don’t, and claim it as their own.

    Anyway read another article about this topic.

  4. This is one of the worst comparisons of Open Source and Commercial GIS I have ever read. There are so many things missing from this I don’t know where to start. As a strong COTS GIS and OS GIS user, this is a really, really bad review.

    People are done with the old “COTS isn’t flexible”, “with OS you can code yourself” approach. It doesn’t happen in the real world. 99% couldn’t code themselves out of a wet bag.

    People are done with the old “COTS is for rich companies and OS is completely free”. All COTS GIS companies have personal use licenses and affordable packages. All OS licenses are way more expensive when factoring in support, lack of analysis capabilities, etc.

    This was written from the standpoint of a one man consulting company bittter that they don’t have enough clients to afford licenses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *